Jay McCarthy's Blog - "His greatest creation is himself." - Harold Bloom

Note: I have moved new content to Blogger, consider yourself redirected.

New Design

As you know, I think Jason Kottke's new design is really hot. So I have modified my blog to be in the style of Kottke.#

Some features of this change:#

  • A nice new 'tag' on the top.
  • Wider entry text boxes, for less scrunchy reading.
  • Prose on the side bar and on the bottom.
  • Nice initial 'Archives' page.
  • No more calendar on every entry page.

I'd like to know what you, dear reader, think about it.#

Also, over the coming week(s) I am planning on restructuring my category hierarchy with what I've learned over the past six or seven months. I have looked at my logs and only see myself and search engines referring directly to category pages, so not much would break even if I didn't strive for compatibility.#

My new strategy for categorization is to focus on the real world object that is being discussed. So, I would not have a category called "Philosophy" but I may have "People/Philosophers." Then, I will have a "Subject" or "Topic" category that will contain those abstract ideas. Also, rather than having a category for each author of the books I've read in "Books", this category will be flat except for instances when a book's posts are split up--as is the case of The Divine Comedy, in which case the book, not the author, will get the subcategory. I think this is more logical and in the future I would to provide a feature like Faceted Classification, for when the blog goes wiki.

A Picture

#

Taken by my ex-girlfriend in early fall of 2003. She was an awesome girl, but we have since broken up.#

saHeeH

Tyler Cowen on inter-governmental debt.#

My take: OK, it seems fair enough to cancel out inter-governmental debt: "they owe it to themselves." But why stop there? Remember the old Keynesian line?: "We owe it to ourselves". Why not cancel out debt altogether? The most important statistic is not the final debt level, rather the estimate of how big a tax increase will be needed to restore fiscal order. Note that Western Europe "gets away" with its current levels of taxation only because the rest of the world does not follow suit. So the worst case scenario is nothing to be complacent about.

I had a similar thought reading "that Keynesian line" for the first time in my Macroeconomics textbook.

Hyatt on Dashboard -- Cool.#

I think this is a brilliant critique of weird new interfaces.#

Chip Gibbons points out why Bill Cosby is a cool guy.#

Duane D. Freese on Fahrenheit 9/11. Aaron Swartz writes about some "stupid criticisms" of the movie.#

Aaron: "Michael Moore loves America. He's spent much of his adult life trying to make this country better. You might disagree with his methods or beliefs, but I do not think his motives can reasonably be impugned. To attack him this way is simply childish."

Question: Do you think the Aaron quote could be said if we changed "Michael Moore" to "George Bush"?

Alex Tabarrok on the Abortion-Missing-Voters article.#

I feel sad for people who care so little about ideas that their response to every issue is, will it help us win? Washington is full of people like that. It's been said that politics degrades all debate into an anti-intellectual counting of noses. Now we are counting missing noses.

In addition to being pathetic the article is wrong. Responding may dignify it more than it deserves but the article does at least get the numbers wrong in an interesting way so here goes.

The reduction in population from abortion is far smaller than the number of abortions. How can this be? The relationship between abortion and birth is not mechanical but depends on the choices that women (and men) make among sexual frequency, contraceptive use, fertility, child spacing and other variables. An unmarried, poor teenager who has an abortion may give birth to a child when she is older, married and financially more secure, that she would not have had if she had not had the abortion. The abortion changes the timing of birth but not the total number of births.

Jason Kottke's redesign is hot.#

Mark Bernstein links to Louis Menand taking on Eats, Shoots and Leaves in The New Yorker.#

A better basis than speaking for the metaphor of voice in writing is singing. You can't tell if someone can sing or not from the way she talks, and although "natural phrasing" and "from the heart" are prized attributes of song, singing that way requires rehearsal, preparation, and getting in touch with whatever it is inside singers that, by a neural kink or the grace of God, enables them to turn themselves into vessels of musical sound. Truss is right (despite what she preaches) when she implies, by her own practice, that the rules really don't have that much to do with it. Before Luciano Pavarotti walked onstage at the opera house, he was in the habit of taking a bite of an apple. That's how he helped his voice to sound spontaneous and natural.

What writers hear when they are trying to write is something more like singing than like speaking. Inside your head, you're yakking away to yourself all the time. Getting that voice down on paper is a depressing experience. When you write, you're trying to transpose what you're thinking into something that is less like an annoying drone and more like a piece of music. This writing voice is the voice that people are surprised not to encounter when they "meet the writer." The writer is not so surprised. Writers labor constantly under the anxiety that this voice, though they have found it a hundred times before, has disappeared forever, and that they will never hear it again. Some writers, when they begin a new piece, spend hours rereading their old stuff, trying to remember how they did it, what it's supposed to sound like. This rarely works; nothing works reliably. Sooner or later, usually later than everyone involved would have preferred, the voice shows up, takes a bite of the apple, and walks onstage.